The Illuminati, Marxism, and “Schwabism,” by Andrew Joppa

The Thesis:There is a provable relationship among three historical groups…The Illuminati…Marxist/Communism, and Karl Schwab’s, World Economic Forum…which I’ll call “Schwabism,” for that is what it is.  (And yes, there was an Illuminati).

 

Each of their founders came from a compressed area of what is now Germany. They were, to a greater or lesser extent, impacted by the persistent philosophies of that area. In general, each group was designed around those same essential philosophies.

 

Though the Illuminati can be offered as the starting point, even it was derived from more ancient philosophies. Basically, all wanted a destruction of all that preceded them and sought, or are seeking, a remake of what it is to be human and, by so doing, gaining control of humanity…and governments… within all its behavioral implications. All three sound superficially benign, if not benevolent, yet all three offered little more than a dystopian future.

 

I would have included National Socialism in this analysis but, I hesitated, not wanting to hear the oft offered rebuttal of, “Nothing can be compared to National Socialism.” In terms of horrors wrought, they would be right…in terms of philosophies they would be wrong.

 

Here’s my case:

 

Adam Weishaupt was a German philosopher and professor of civil and canon law. On May 1, 1776 he founded the “Illuminati” in Bavaria. Initially, “Illumination” was designated for a group of “outstanding and enlightened” individuals in the society. Each isolated cell of initiates reported to a superior, whom they did not know; a party structure that was effectively adopted by those later groups. Secrecy was a top priority.

 

Weishaupt’s Illuminati prescribed in great detail everything which the members had obediently to read and think. This approach to “illumination” or “enlightenment” was a degraded and twisted attack on The Enlightenment itself. Independence of thought and judgement was specifically prevented by the Order of the Illuminati’s rules and regulations. All this takes place under the direction of another, namely under that of the “Superiors” [of the Order].

 

Although the Illuminati has been mystified in popular fiction, there is nothing bizarre about its story. So strikingly similar is Illuminism, in its basic principles, to what we recognize as Marxism, and the World Economic Forum today, it is reasonable to surmise that it was used as the model for all of those drawn up many decades later.

 

To illustrate this, Weishaupt’s seven-part plan for Illuminism was as follows. Consider both Marxism and Schwabism against these points:

 

1. Abolition of all Existing Governments

2. Abolition of Private Property

3. Abolition of Inheritance

4. Abolition of Patriotism

5. Abolition of the Family Unit

6. Abolition of Religion

7. Creation of a New World Order (World Government)

 

Anyone who has even casually studied Marxism or “Schwabism” can certainly see their significant relationship to the Illuminati.

 

The WEF seeks to realize, through its “Great Reset” agenda, what it calls The Fourth Industrial Revolution that…“The Fourth Industrial Revolution is characterized by a range of new technologies that are fusing the physical, digital and biological worlds, impacting all disciplines, economies and industries, and even challenging ideas about what it means to be human.

 

It goes on…The Fourth Industrial Revolution is the first where the tools of technology can become literally embedded within us and even change who we are at the level of our genetic makeup. At this point, there should be no question in your mind that the WEF, through the scientific means of bio-digital convergence and genetic engineering, intends for the creation of new types of human life so far beyond natural man that its members will be regarded as a superior class.

 

To get a mental image of what bio-digital convergence might look like, look no further than the scenarios being proposed by the “Policy-Foresight Agency” of Canada. It is exploring the applications of bio-digital convergence to society. This is a clear sign that the Canadian government …for but one… is working to align its future policies with the WEF’s goal of trans-humanizing mankind.

 

This would not be unexpected, given that Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was a WEF protégé, having been groomed to champion its cause as a member of the organization’s “Young Global Leaders” (YGL) program – just as too many of the world’s current leaders and influencers of government, enterprise, academia and mass media have also been.

 

In fact, the founder of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, confirmed both the influence over the Canadian government that his organization had already established and the WEF’s ongoing program of deploying its Young Global Leaders to infiltrate the decision-making bodies of national governments when, he said:

 

“When I mention, now, names like Mrs. Merkel, even Vladimir Putin, and so on: they all have been Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum. But what we are very proud of now, with the young generation, like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina, and so on is that we penetrate the cabinets. So, yesterday I was at the reception for Prime Minister Trudeau, and I would know that half of this cabinet, or even more than half of this cabinet are…for our…actually Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum.”

 

Haven’t you wondered where Justin Trudeau drew the “authority” for some of his draconian actions.

 

By comparison, the WEF’s Global Shapers Community, “a network of young people driving dialogue, action and change” which is to train its future agents of global influence in the one-decade younger age bracket, touts vastly more impressive numbers: over 10,200 active and 4,100 alumni members, with 457 “hubs” located in 148 countries. Active membership in the group appears to have nearly doubled since January 2016, based on a briefing published by the European Parliamentary Research Service which stated that there were 5,300 members at that time.

 

It is pertinent to reflect on the tenets of Marxism, as the WEF has apparently embraced them as guiding principles. This can be seen at various points in the WEF’s literature. As stated on its website “…rethinking capitalism, or giving capitalism a “Great Reset, means that capitalism and socialism will need to merge to create a productive and inclusive economic and social model.” So, the WEF is prescribing a higher dose of socialism as the cure for the world’s economic and social ills.

 

In November 2016, the WEF released a short video entitled “Eight predictions for the world in 2030”. The first, and most infamous, “prediction” declared in the video was “You’ll own nothing, and you’ll be happy” then qualified by, “Whatever you want, you’ll rent, and it’ll be delivered by drone”.

 

With that in mind, let us now reflect on what Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels had to say about property ownership in the Manifesto of the Communist Party:

 

 “The distinguishing feature of Communism is not the abolition of property generally, but the abolition of bourgeois property. But modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products, that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few. In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.”

 

The parallel of the WEF’s notion that private property will cease to exist to Marxism’s avowal of it as a cornerstone of communist ideology is impossible to ignore.

 

Nonetheless, this is the narrative that the WEF offers up to justify our eventual ownership of nothing: A world where the boon of green energy renders personal possessions obsolete and our lives materially carefree, but which – it is unapologetically implied – will be only for those of us willing to give up our unrestricted freedom of movement and our privacy to the point that even our innermost thoughts are no longer our own.

 

To be sure many world leaders have aligned their policies with the aims of the WEF under Critical Race Theory 101 and the victimology of “Wokeness”. Much of what we’re experiencing beyond that can also be laid at the doorstep of the WEF:

 

• Endorsement of lawlessness and societal decay by decriminalizing crimes like burglary and illicit drug use and handicapping law enforcement in high-crime locales by defunding 105 and imposing vaccination mandates on police departments; 106 107

• Financially incentivizing rather than remedying joblessness and vagrancy

• Suspending the property rights of property owners and landowners while encouraging delinquency, trespassing, and squatting

• Cutting off critical transnational fuel supply lines.

• Welcoming and covertly resettling hundreds of thousands of unvetted illegal immigrants into society while trying to block legislation requiring that citizens properly identify themselves when voting

• Declaring unconstitutional vaccination mandates on large employers and even the populations of entire countries

• Subjecting citizens to extended lockdowns and travel restrictions

• Censoring any views contradicting their expressed narratives as “misinformation”

• Denying citizens’ rights of assembly and freedom of expression by disrupting legal, peaceful public protests

• Arming an infamous terrorist group in the Middle East with tens of billions of dollars’ worth of advanced military weapons and vehicles while abandoning a substantial number of free-world citizens.

 

All these actions performed under the direct or indirect influence of “Schwabism.”

 

As long as the power of these actors remains unchecked, the list of offenses will undoubtedly go on and life on this planet will become increasingly threatened. As has been said, “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.” It is paved even more deeply with bad intentions.